Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] dmaengine: add SG support to dmaengine_unmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This should provide support to unmap scatterlist with the
> dmaengine_unmap_data. We will support only 1 scatterlist per
> direction. The DMA addresses array has been overloaded for the
> 2 or less entries DMA unmap data structure in order to store the
> SG pointer(s).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c   |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index d9a71f0..7d1f7ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -1130,16 +1130,35 @@ static void dmaengine_unmap(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>         struct dmaengine_unmap_data *unmap = container_of(kref, typeof(*unmap), kref);
>         struct device *dev = unmap->dev;
> -       int cnt, i;
> +       int cnt, i, sg_nents;
> +       struct scatterlist *sg;
> +
> +       sg_nents = dma_unmap_data_sg_to_nents(unmap, unmap->map_cnt);
> +       if (sg_nents) {
> +               i = 0;
> +               cnt = 1;
> +               dma_unmap_data_get_virt(unmap, sg, i);
> +               dma_unmap_sg(dev, sg, sg_nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +       } else {
> +               cnt = unmap->to_cnt;
> +               for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> +                       dma_unmap_page(dev, unmap->addr[i], unmap->len,
> +                                       DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +       }
> +
> +       sg_nents = dma_unmap_data_sg_from_nents(unmap, unmap->map_cnt);
> +       if (sg_nents) {
> +               dma_unmap_data_get_virt(unmap, sg, i);
> +               dma_unmap_sg(dev, sg, sg_nents, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +               cnt++;
> +               i++;
> +       } else {
> +               cnt += unmap->from_cnt;
> +               for (; i < cnt; i++)
> +                       dma_unmap_page(dev, unmap->addr[i], unmap->len,
> +                                       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +       }
>
> -       cnt = unmap->to_cnt;
> -       for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> -               dma_unmap_page(dev, unmap->addr[i], unmap->len,
> -                              DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -       cnt += unmap->from_cnt;
> -       for (; i < cnt; i++)
> -               dma_unmap_page(dev, unmap->addr[i], unmap->len,
> -                              DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>         cnt += unmap->bidi_cnt;
>         for (; i < cnt; i++) {
>                 if (unmap->addr[i] == 0)
> @@ -1183,6 +1202,10 @@ static int __init dmaengine_init_unmap_pool(void)
>                 size = sizeof(struct dmaengine_unmap_data) +
>                        sizeof(dma_addr_t) * p->size;
>
> +               /* add 2 more entries for SG nents overload */
> +               if (i == 0)
> +                       size += sizeof(dma_addr_t) * 2;
> +
>                 p->cache = kmem_cache_create(p->name, size, 0,
>                                              SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
>                 if (!p->cache)
> @@ -1209,6 +1232,10 @@ dmaengine_get_unmap_data(struct device *dev, int nr, gfp_t flags)
>                 return NULL;
>
>         memset(unmap, 0, sizeof(*unmap));
> +       /* clear the overloaded sg nents entries */
> +       if (nr < 3)
> +               memset(&unmap->addr[nr], 0,
> +                               DMA_UNMAP_SG_ENTS * sizeof(dma_addr_t));
>         kref_init(&unmap->kref);
>         unmap->dev = dev;
>         unmap->map_cnt = nr;
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index fc25475..3a7fc68 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -476,6 +476,28 @@ struct dmaengine_unmap_data {
>         dma_addr_t addr[0];
>  };
>
> +#define DMA_UNMAP_SG_ENTS      2
> +#define dma_unmap_data_sg_to_nents(x, n) x->addr[n]
> +#define dma_unmap_data_sg_from_nents(x, n) x->addr[n+1]
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_BUS_ADDR_T_64BIT)
> +/* 32bit CPU, 64bit DMA */
> +#define dma_unmap_data_set_virt(u, virt, idx) \
> +       do {\
> +               u32 tmp = (u32)virt; \
> +               u->addr[idx] = tmp; \
> +       } while (0);
> +
> +#define dma_unmap_data_get_virt(u, ptr, idx) \
> +       do {\
> +               u32 tmp = u->addr[idx]; \
> +               ptr = (void *)tmp; \
> +       } while (0);
> +#else
> +#define dma_unmap_data_set_virt(u, virt, idx) u->addr[idx] = (dma_addr_t)virt;
> +#define dma_unmap_data_get_virt(u, ptr, idx) ptr = (void *)u->addr[idx]
> +#endif

I'm not keen on this cleverness, let's make scatterlist a first class
citizen of dmaengine_unmap_data and union it with the address array.
Ideally we could deprecate support for the dma_map_page() and
dma_map_single() cases and rewrite all users to submit requests in
terms of scatterlists. This would be nice step towards fixing the
dmaengine operation type proliferation problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux