Re: [PATCH 5/5] libnvdimm: add DMA support for pmem blk-mq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:15:12AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > I can put in a tunable knob like Johannes suggested and leave the
>> > default for that to what it is currently. And we can adjust as necessary
>> > as we do more testing.
>>
>> That's the problem, we need a multi-dimensional knob. It's not just
>> transfer-size that effects total delivered bandwidth.
>
> If Dan opposes it so much, I'm OK with no tunable. I'm just expressing my
> concern that we get reports like this [1] one here as a result.

Sorry if I came off harsh. In that report from Mel he's showing a slow
down in a representative workload not just a canned bandwidth
benchmark. I'm worried that tuning for a single dimension on an fio
run doesn't actually improve throughput delivered to an application.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux