On 8/2/2017 4:52 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> Do we need a new API / new function, or new capability?
> Hmmm...you are right. I wonder if we need something like DMA_SG cap....
>
>
Unfortunately, DMA_SG means something else. Maybe, we need DMA_MEMCPY_SG
to be similar with DMA_MEMSET_SG.
enum dma_transaction_type {
DMA_MEMCPY,
DMA_XOR,
DMA_PQ,
DMA_XOR_VAL,
DMA_PQ_VAL,
DMA_MEMSET,
DMA_MEMSET_SG,
DMA_INTERRUPT,
DMA_SG,
DMA_PRIVATE,
DMA_ASYNC_TX,
DMA_SLAVE,
DMA_CYCLIC,
DMA_INTERLEAVE,
/* last transaction type for creation of the capabilities mask */
DMA_TX_TYPE_END,
};
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
