On 22/04/2017 01:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:12:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Mason, >> >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:58:58 +0200 Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, the fix is trivial. >>> >>> The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. >>> for_each_clear_bit_from() expects an unsigned long pointer, >>> not an array address. >>> >>> I'll send a patch to the drivers/dma maintainers. >> >> The fix really needs to go into the arm tree (as well?) since that is >> the tree that has the patch that causes the build to break (even if the >> actual bug was preexisting). > > Or I drop the offending patch (done) and we get the DMA subsystem fixed > first. Given how long it's been this way, I doubt there's any hurry to > get this change in for the next merge window. Hello Russell, Is it safe to apply the patch now? http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8679/1 Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
