Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 14:03:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdV9iU2vK+ae1vPET83Ck5UVzs-kVQJVgFeEA8aUi8vZ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170528093051.11816-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20170528093051.11816-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMuHMdV9iU2vK+ae1vPET83Ck5UVzs-kVQJVgFeEA8aUi8vZ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

Geert,

thanks for the Acks.

> I'd fix "SH/R-Mobile" too, while at it.

That would be a seperate tree-wide series in my book.

Regards,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] tree-wide: use proper 'R-Car' product name
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40, imx-dma: Cleanup scatterlist layering violations
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: Add IOMMU support to slave tranfers
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [Linux for Samsung SOC] [eCos] [Linux PCI] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites]

Powered by Linux