On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:44:42AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0100, Alexandre Bailon wrote: > >> Despite the CPPI 4.1 is a generic DMA, it is tied to USB. > >> On the dsps, CPPI 4.1 interrupt's registers are in USBSS (the MUSB glue). > >> Currently, to enable / disable and clear interrupts, the CPPI 4.1 driver > >> maps and accesses to USBSS's register, which making CPPI 4.1 driver not > >> really generic. > >> Move the interrupt management to dsps driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/dma/cppi41.c | 28 ++++------------ > >> drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > This patch touches both dma and musb modules, I know it makes review > > easier, but how we get it merged? One maintainer ACK it and the other > > pick it up? Sorry for the dumb question, I am new as a maintainer... > > For patches where the change needs to go together, then one maintainer > can ack, and the other can merge. Alternately, if the patch can be done Ok, this is what I thought :) > in a way that the parts can go independently, that is sometimes > cleaner. I don't know this code well enough to know which is which. In this case it is better to keep all together, since it moves code from one place to another. I think it makes sense it goes to my tree, since the reset patches are for musb. Regards, -Bin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
