* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> [170118 11:18]: > Just thinking, may be cppi41 should not be platform device at all > and it might be reasonable to have it as lib with cppi41_init()/cppi41_remove(), > so musb SoC glue layer will initialize it, because it provides services to > other HW blocks withing musb only. Nah, we already have things almost working :) And if some TI SoC with general purpose cppi41 pops up like a DSP running Linux, we're in big trouble. And musb is already a mess as is.. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html