Re: dmaengine: dw-dmac: Custom cyclic API (Why?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 15:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:38:00AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 12:05 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > > ++dw-dmac Maintainers

> > I used to have some semi-finished patch to switch to generic API,
> > though
> > at that point I had no means to test it.
> > 
> > Since I eventually got iDMA 32-bit, which is used as LPE Audio DMA
> > engine, support in my branch I might test it in the future, though I
> > think someone else would be much faster than me.
> 
> no we can't, since the DSP is involved and takes control, so unless we
> do
> lots of nasty hacks, it won't be testable. I don't see the ROI for
> such an
> effort.

Thanks for clarification

> btw, feel free to test and send patches if you have such a h/w

Actually we have AVR32 connected to our lab. So, I can test it there,
but I rather need a patch to use some dummy stub instead of codec (it
has no codec connected).

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux