Hi Jose Miguel Abreu,
Thanks for the review....
> > - last = segment;
> > + for (j = 0; j < chan->num_frms; ) {
> > + list_for_each_entry(segment, &desc->segments, node)
> {
> > + if (chan->ext_addr)
> > + vdma_desc_write_64(chan,
> > +
> XILINX_VDMA_REG_START_ADDRESS_64(i++),
> > + segment->hw.buf_addr,
> > + segment->hw.buf_addr_msb);
> > + else
> > + vdma_desc_write(chan,
> > +
> XILINX_VDMA_REG_START_ADDRESS(i++),
> > + segment->hw.buf_addr);
> > +
> > + last = segment;
>
> Hmm, is it possible to submit more than one segment? If so, then i and j will get
> out of sync.
If h/w is configured for more than 1 frame buffer and user submits more than one frame buffer
We can submit more than one frame/ segment to hw right??
>
> > + }
> > + list_del(&desc->node);
> > + list_add_tail(&desc->node, &chan->active_list);
> > + j++;
>
> But if i is non zero and pending_list has more than num_frms then i will not
> wrap-around as it should and will write to invalid framebuffer location, right?
Yep will fix in v2...
If (if (list_empty(&chan->pending_list)) || (i == chan->num_frms)
break;
Above condition is sufficient right???
>
> > + if (list_empty(&chan->pending_list))
> > + break;
> > + desc = list_first_entry(&chan->pending_list,
> > + struct
> xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor,
> > + node);
> > }
> >
> > if (!last)
> > @@ -1114,14 +1124,13 @@ static void xilinx_vdma_start_transfer(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
> > vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMDLY_STRIDE,
> > last->hw.stride);
> > vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_VSIZE, last-
> >hw.vsize);
>
> Maybe a check that all framebuffers contain valid addresses should be done
> before programming vsize so that VDMA does not try to write to invalid
> addresses.
Do we really need to check for valid address???
I didn't get you what to do you mean by invalid address could you please explain???
In the driver we are reading form the pending_list which will be updated by pep_interleaved_dma
Call so we are under assumption that user sends the proper address right???
>
> > +
> > + chan->desc_submitcount += j;
> > + chan->desc_pendingcount -= j;
> > }
> >
> > chan->idle = false;
> > if (!chan->has_sg) {
> > - list_del(&desc->node);
> > - list_add_tail(&desc->node, &chan->active_list);
> > - chan->desc_submitcount++;
> > - chan->desc_pendingcount--;
> > if (chan->desc_submitcount == chan->num_frms)
> > chan->desc_submitcount = 0;
>
> "desc_submitcount >= chan->num_frms would be safer here.
Sure will fix in v2...
Regards,
Kedar.
>
> > } else {
>
> Best regards,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body
> of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
