On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 10/1/2016 2:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >> Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > >> ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); > >> goto out; > >> } > >> + of_node_get(child); > >> + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > >> of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> - > >> + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> + of_node_put(child); > > > > should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for > > platforms with msi? > > I followed the pattern in of_platform_device_create_pdata function. of_msi_configure does > nothing if MSI is not enabled as irq_find_matching_host returns NULL. It didn't have any > side effects on my testing either. yeah later on I did look up the of_msi_configure() and I suspected this. I think it would be worthwhile to document this assumption here. Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html