On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:34:08PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Sorry. I forgot to mention that the TEGRA210_CLK_APE_SLCG_OVR > > clock is required for the tests. So I cherry-picked 2 patches > > from your audio branch to the linux-next: > > clk: tegra210: Add SLCG override gate clocks > > ARM64: tegra: DT: Add SLCG clock for AUD > > And it seems that you've submitted that patch once but it got > > hold because it wasn't so useful at that time? > Yes it was not being used at the time. It is on my list of things to do > and we need to revisit it. There was some discussion on the best way to > handle these clocks from a client perspective. I am not sure we came to > a conclusion on this. I need to find some time to look at this. I may also take a look to speed it up. Yet, putting that clock aside, how about this patch then? I think we don't need to wait for that clock patch in order to announce that we support this now on a specific SoC but can just treat it as a new feature of a DMA controller, which sounds quite plausible to me since the ADMA module is now being disabled in all dts files of existing SoCs -- There have to be some local changes in any way so as to test it with the mainline code. Thanks Nic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
