Hi Lee,
Thanks for reviewing.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
>
> > slim core is used as a basis for many IPs in the STi
> > chipsets such as fdma and demux. To avoid duplicating
> > the elf loading code in each device driver a slim
> > rproc driver has been created.
> >
> > This driver is designed to be used by other device drivers
> > such as fdma, or demux whose IP is based around a slim core.
> > The device driver can call slim_rproc_alloc() to allocate
> > a slim rproc and slim_rproc_put() when finished.
> >
> > This driver takes care of ioremapping the slim
> > registers (dmem, imem, slimcore, peripherals), whose offsets
> > and sizes can change between IP's. It also obtains and enables
> > any clocks used by the device. This approach avoids having
> > a double mapping of the registers as slim_rproc does not register
> > its own platform device. It also maps well to device tree
> > abstraction as it allows us to have one dt node for the whole
> > device.
> >
> > All of the generic rproc elf loading code can be reused, and
> > we provide start() stop() hooks to start and stop the slim
> > core once the firmware has been loaded. This has been tested
> > successfully with fdma driver.
>
> Nit. It would be good to use a constant line-wrap.
>
> 'M-x post-mode' will help with this.
Can you provide the magic which makes this happen for GIT commit messages?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 364 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h | 53 +++++
> > 4 files changed, 426 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > index 1a8bf76a..06765e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > @@ -100,4 +100,12 @@ config ST_REMOTEPROC
> > processor framework.
> > This can be either built-in or a loadable module.
> >
> > +config ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC
> > + tristate "ST Slim remoteproc support"
> > + select REMOTEPROC
> > + help
> > + Say y here to support firmware loading on IP based around
> > + the Slim core.
> > + If unsure say N.
> > +
> > endmenu
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > index 92d3758..db1dae7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DA8XX_REMOTEPROC) += da8xx_remoteproc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_MDT_LOADER) += qcom_mdt_loader.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_Q6V5_PIL) += qcom_q6v5_pil.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f4bf2d7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
> > +/*
> > + * st_slim_rproc.c
>
> These serve no purpose and have a habit of becoming out-of-date.
> Please remove it and replace with a nice succinct description
> instead.
OK will fix.
>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 STMicroelectronics
>
> Nit: '\n' here.
Will fix.
>
> > + * Author: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Nit: '\n' here.
Will fix.
>
> > + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2
>
> Are you sure ST are okay with the shortened version of the GPL?
Do you mean the banner should be like this?
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
As I'm not aware of a shortened version of the GPV v2 license.
>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > +#include <linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h>
> > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> > +
> > +/* slimcore registers */
>
> What's it called? slimcore, slim core, ST Slim?
It is usually referred to as SLIM core, or SLIM CPU in the various functional
specifications.
>
> Please be consistent. Use the name from the datasheet.
OK. The datasheet isn't consistent either, so we will settle on SLIM core and
SLIM CPU.
>
> > +#define SLIM_ID_OFST 0x0
> > +#define SLIM_VER_OFST 0x4
> > +
> > +#define SLIM_EN_OFST 0x8
> > +#define SLIM_EN_RUN BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define SLIM_CLK_GATE_OFST 0xC
> > +#define SLIM_CLK_GATE_DIS BIT(0)
> > +#define SLIM_CLK_GATE_RESET BIT(2)
> > +
> > +#define SLIM_SLIM_PC_OFST 0x20
> > +
> > +/* dmem registers */
> > +#define SLIM_REV_ID_OFST 0x0
> > +#define SLIM_REV_ID_MIN_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > +#define SLIM_REV_ID_MIN(id) ((id & SLIM_REV_ID_MIN_MASK) >> 8)
> > +#define SLIM_REV_ID_MAJ_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> > +#define SLIM_REV_ID_MAJ(id) ((id & SLIM_REV_ID_MAJ_MASK) >> 16)
> > +
> > +
> > +/* peripherals registers */
> > +#define SLIM_STBUS_SYNC_OFST 0xF88
> > +#define SLIM_STBUS_SYNC_DIS BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define SLIM_INT_SET_OFST 0xFD4
> > +#define SLIM_INT_CLR_OFST 0xFD8
> > +#define SLIM_INT_MASK_OFST 0xFDC
> > +
> > +#define SLIM_CMD_CLR_OFST 0xFC8
> > +#define SLIM_CMD_MASK_OFST 0xFCC
> > +
> > +static const char *mem_names[ST_SLIM_MEM_MAX] = {
> > + [ST_SLIM_DMEM] = "dmem",
> > + [ST_SLIM_IMEM] = "imem",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int slim_clk_get(struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc, struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + int clk, err;
> > +
> > + for (clk = 0; clk < ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK; clk++) {
> > + slim_rproc->clks[clk] = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, clk);
> > + if (IS_ERR(slim_rproc->clks[clk])) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + goto err_put_clks;
> > + slim_rproc->clks[clk] = NULL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put_clks:
> > + while (--clk >= 0)
> > + clk_put(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void slim_clk_disable(struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc)
> > +{
> > + int clk;
> > +
> > + for (clk = 0; clk < ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK && slim_rproc->clks[clk]; clk++)
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int slim_clk_enable(struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc)
> > +{
> > + int clk, ret;
> > +
> > + for (clk = 0; clk < ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK && slim_rproc->clks[clk]; clk++) {
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_disable_clks;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_disable_clks:
> > + while (--clk >= 0)
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Remoteproc slim specific device handlers
> > + */
>
> I suggest not using kernel-doc format for this type of comment.
Will fix.
>
> > +static int slim_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > + unsigned long hw_id, hw_ver, fw_rev;
> > + u32 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = slim_clk_enable(slim_rproc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clocks\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* disable CPU pipeline clock & reset cpu pipeline */
>
> Be consistent. Is it 'cpu' or 'CPU'. Personally I find using
> 'correct English' to be the most consistent way of formatting
> comments i.e. Capitals for names, acronyms and at the start of a
> sentence.
OK will update to CPU for both.
>
> > + val = SLIM_CLK_GATE_DIS | SLIM_CLK_GATE_RESET;
> > + writel(val, slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_CLK_GATE_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* disable SLIM core STBus sync */
> > + writel(SLIM_STBUS_SYNC_DIS, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_STBUS_SYNC_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* enable cpu pipeline clock */
> > + writel(!SLIM_CLK_GATE_DIS,
> > + slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_CLK_GATE_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* clear int & cmd mailbox */
> > + writel(~0U, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_INT_CLR_OFST);
> > + writel(~0U, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_CMD_CLR_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* enable all channels cmd & int */
> > + writel(~0U, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_INT_MASK_OFST);
> > + writel(~0U, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_CMD_MASK_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* enable cpu */
> > + writel(SLIM_EN_RUN, slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_EN_OFST);
> > +
> > + hw_id = readl_relaxed(slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_ID_OFST);
> > + hw_ver = readl_relaxed(slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_VER_OFST);
> > +
> > + fw_rev = readl(slim_rproc->mem[ST_SLIM_DMEM].cpu_addr +
> > + SLIM_REV_ID_OFST);
> > +
> > + dev_info(dev, "fw rev:%ld.%ld on SLIM %ld.%ld\n",
> > + SLIM_REV_ID_MAJ(fw_rev), SLIM_REV_ID_MIN(fw_rev),
> > + hw_id, hw_ver);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int slim_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /* mask all (cmd & int) channels */
> > + writel(0UL, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_INT_MASK_OFST);
> > + writel(0UL, slim_rproc->peri + SLIM_CMD_MASK_OFST);
> > +
> > + /* disable cpu pipeline clock */
> > + writel(SLIM_CLK_GATE_DIS, slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_CLK_GATE_OFST);
> > +
> > + writel(!SLIM_EN_RUN, slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_EN_OFST);
> > +
> > + val = readl(slim_rproc->slimcore + SLIM_EN_OFST);
> > + if (val & SLIM_EN_RUN)
> > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "Failed to disable SLIM");
> > +
> > + slim_clk_disable(slim_rproc);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "slim stopped\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
> > +{
> > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > + void *va = NULL;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ST_SLIM_MEM_MAX; i++) {
> > + if (da != slim_rproc->mem[i].bus_addr)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (len <= slim_rproc->mem[i].size) {
> > + /* __force to make sparse happy with type conversion */
> > + va = (__force void *)slim_rproc->mem[i].cpu_addr;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "%s: da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x va = 0x%p\n",
> > + __func__, da, len, va);
>
> Non-consistent with other debug prints. I suggest dropping the
> _func_. It's a nice to have during initial debugging, but I don't
> usually find them useful upstream.
OK will fix.
>
> > + return va;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = {
> > + .start = slim_rproc_start,
> > + .stop = slim_rproc_stop,
> > + .da_to_va = slim_rproc_da_to_va,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Firmware handler operations: sanity, boot address, load ...
> > + */
>
> Don't use kernel-doc for these.
Will fix.
>
> > +static struct resource_table empty_rsc_tbl = {
> > + .ver = 1,
> > + .num = 0,
> > +};
>
> This should go away soon.
>
> Be prepared to remove this once the code lands.
OK.
>
> > +static struct resource_table *slim_rproc_find_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > + const struct firmware *fw,
> > + int *tablesz)
> > +{
> > + *tablesz = sizeof(empty_rsc_tbl);
> > + return &empty_rsc_tbl;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct rproc_fw_ops slim_rproc_fw_ops = {
> > + .find_rsc_table = slim_rproc_find_rsc_table,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * st_slim_rproc_alloc() - allocate and initialise slim rproc
> > + * @pdev: Pointer to the platform_device struct
> > + * @fw_name: Name of firmware for rproc to use
> > + *
> > + * Function for allocating and initialising a slim rproc for use by
> > + * device drivers whose IP is based around the slim slim core. It
>
> "slim slim"? Do you mean "really slim"? ;)
Will update to SLIM core.
>
> > + * obtains and enables any clocks required by the slim core and also
> > + * ioremaps the various IO.
> > + *
> > + * Returns st_slim_rproc pointer or PTR_ERR() on error.
> > + */
> > +
> > +struct st_slim_rproc *st_slim_rproc_alloc(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + char *fw_name)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc;
> > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int err, i;
> > + const struct rproc_fw_ops *elf_ops;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(!np || !fw_name))
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> !np should not happen, ever. You can remove the check.
OK, will fix.
>
> > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,slim-rproc"))
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &slim_rproc_ops,
> > + fw_name, sizeof(*slim_rproc));
> > + if (!rproc)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + rproc->has_iommu = false;
> > +
> > + slim_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > + slim_rproc->rproc = rproc;
> > +
> > + elf_ops = rproc->fw_ops;
> > + /* Use some generic elf ops */
> > + slim_rproc_fw_ops.load = elf_ops->load;
> > + slim_rproc_fw_ops.sanity_check = elf_ops->sanity_check;
> > +
> > + rproc->fw_ops = &slim_rproc_fw_ops;
> > +
> > + /* get imem and dmem */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names); i++) {
> > +
>
> Superfluous '\n'.
Will fix.
>
> > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > + mem_names[i]);
> > +
> > + slim_rproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(slim_rproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_ioremap_resource failed\n");
> > + err = PTR_ERR(slim_rproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > + slim_rproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> > + slim_rproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
> > + }
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "slimcore");
>
> Superfluous '\n'.
Will fix.
>
> > + slim_rproc->slimcore = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(slim_rproc->slimcore)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > + "devm_ioremap_resource failed for slimcore\n");
>
> Best not to quote function names. Instead write the description in
> plain English; "failed to remap 'slimcore' IO", or similar.
Will fix.
>
> > + err = PTR_ERR(slim_rproc->slimcore);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "peripherals");
> > +
>
> Superfluous '\n'.
Will fix.
>
> > + slim_rproc->peri = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(slim_rproc->peri)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_ioremap_resource failed for peri\n");
>
> As above.
>
> > + err = PTR_ERR(slim_rproc->peri);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = slim_clk_get(slim_rproc, dev);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + /* Register as a remoteproc device */
> > + err = rproc_add(rproc);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "registration of slim remoteproc failed\n");
> > + goto err_clk;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return slim_rproc;
> > +
> > +err_clk:
> > + for (i = 0; i < ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK && slim_rproc->clks[i]; i++)
> > + clk_put(slim_rproc->clks[i]);
> > +err:
> > + rproc_put(rproc);
> > + return ERR_PTR(err);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_slim_rproc_alloc);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * st_slim_rproc_put() - put slim rproc resources
> > + * @slim_rproc: Pointer to the st_slim_rproc struct
> > + *
> > + * Function for calling respective _put() functions on
>
> Early line wrap
Will fix.
>
> <--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------->
>
> > + * slim_rproc resources.
> > + *
>
> Superfluous '\n'.
Will fix.
>
> > + */
> > +void st_slim_rproc_put(struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc)
> > +{
> > + int clk;
> > +
> > + if (!slim_rproc)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (clk = 0; clk < ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK && slim_rproc->clks[clk]; clk++)
> > + clk_put(slim_rproc->clks[clk]);
> > +
> > + rproc_del(slim_rproc->rproc);
> > + rproc_put(slim_rproc->rproc);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_slim_rproc_put);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Griffin");
>
> Email.
Will fix.
>
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics SLIM rproc driver");
>
> Now it's "SLIM"? Make up your mind.
Will fix.
>
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..64a2c5b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +/*
> > + * st_slim_rproc.h
>
> As above.
Will fix.
>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 STMicroelectronics
> > + * Author: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2
> > + */
>
> Same for the *.c header.
Will fix.
>
> > +#ifndef _ST_SLIM_H
> > +#define _ST_SLIM_H
>
> Best to mention the subsystem too.
Will fix.
>
> > +#define ST_SLIM_MEM_MAX 2
> > +#define ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK 4
> > +
> > +enum {
> > + ST_SLIM_DMEM,
> > + ST_SLIM_IMEM,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct st_slim_mem - slim internal memory structure
> > + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> > + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region
> > + * @size: Size of the memory region
> > + */
> > +struct st_slim_mem {
> > + void __iomem *cpu_addr;
> > + phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> > + size_t size;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct st_slim_rproc - SLIM slim core
> > + * @rproc: rproc handle
> > + * @mem: slim memory information
> > + * @slimcore: slim slimcore regs
> > + * @peri: slim peripheral regs
> > + * @clks: slim clocks
> > + */
> > +struct st_slim_rproc {
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct st_slim_mem mem[ST_SLIM_MEM_MAX];
> > + void __iomem *slimcore;
> > + void __iomem *peri;
> > +
> > + /* st_slim_rproc private */
> > + struct clk *clks[ST_SLIM_MAX_CLK];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct st_slim_rproc *st_slim_rproc_alloc(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + char *fw_name);
> > +void st_slim_rproc_put(struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc);
> > +
> > +#endif
>
regards,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
