Re: [PATCH v4 00/41] Adding transaction result return for dmaengine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 21:27 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > 
> > On 07/20/2016 10:10 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > 
> > > The following series implements a way for DMA drivers to report
> > > the result
> > > of a transaction via callback in order to notify the upper layer.
> > > Thanks
> > > Lars for providing guidance. 
> > > 
> > > I added usage of the new mechanism in the ioatdma driver and also
> > > updated
> > > the NTB code that uses this mechanism to receive the error. Jon,
> > > I assume
> > > you'll let Vinod push the two NTB patches since it's part of the
> > > series.
> > > 
> > 
> > Looks good to me. Thanks for taking care of this important task,
> > well done.
> 
> Yes this is looking quite good indeed :) Thanks Dave & Lars.
> 
> Now, I am in dilema for merging this. Saw some acks but no tested-by. 
> Since
> we are so close to merge window (thanks to Linus travelling ;-) ),
> am thinking of moving it out.
> 
> But such a tree wide update would help getting merged now...
> 
> Suggestions folks...
> 

A large number of the drivers don't seem to have maintainers....
��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux