Hi Lars, > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM > To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>; Shubhrajyoti Datta > <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>; > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Ian Campbell > <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michal > Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xxxxxxxxxx>; > vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; Moritz Fischer > <moritz.fischer@xxxxxxxxx>; Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Anirudha > Sarangi <anirudh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri > <punnaia@xxxxxxxxxx>; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma > > On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote: > [...] > >> however we should keep the names same as the TRM. > > > > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to > > equivalent clocks of h/w > > Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward to > understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come up > with random new names. Ok will fix in the v2... Regards, Kedar. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
