On 04/06/2016 02:44 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:56:20AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt | 2 ++ >> drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 7 +++++++ > > The binding should be a separate patch.. I'm not sure, isn't this rule valid only when we introduce the binding document? But if you insist I can make a separate patch. > >> >> + bdev->controlled_remotely = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, >> + "qcom,controlled-remotely"); >> + > > we need some defaults here, how will this work with boards withe older DT. > if the introduced property missing from DT node the driver behavior is preserved. -- regards, Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
