On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 16:21 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are > > > > managed remotely > > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. > > > > So skip the bam_init > > > > for any such platform if DT property is set. > > > > > > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C > > > > boards. > > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA > > > > controller. > > > > > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first. > > > > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an > > update in > > my queue > > No updates that I can see. The original is here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113 > And that seemed to have some discussion so I dont recall looking at it. -- ~Vinod ��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
