Hi Mark!
On 11.03.2016 09:51, Martin Sperl wrote:
On 10.03.2016, at 09:57, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Alternative options that have been considered:
* there is unfortunately no “interrupt-names” property (like it exists for
reg, dma), because then I would have preferred to used:
interrupts = <...>, <...>, …;
interrupt-name = “dma0”, “dma1”, ..., “dma10”, “dmashared”, “dmaall”;
with something like this we could probably have avoided both properties
and just added a legacy mapping
This would require some changes to the irq framework (which I wanted
to avoid)
I have posted a patch based on this approach (after having found out
that it is possible
with the current framework using platform_get_irq_byname).
Rob Herring has "Acked" the documentation patch:
[PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: bcm2835: add interrupt-names property
Is this approach acceptable for you as well, so that we can try to get
it merged?
Thanks, Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html