On lun., 2016-02-29 at 07:03 -0800, Peter Hurley wrote: > Not the case. The softirq is raised from interrupt. > > Before Eric's change, when an interrupt raises a new softirq > while processing another softirq, the new softirq is immediately > processed *after the existing softirq completes*. > > After Eric's change, when an interrupt raises a new softirq > while processing another softirq and _that softirq wakes a process_, > the new softirq is *deferred to normal process priority*. For the last time, this is not true. My patch changed the probability for this to happen. It will happen even if you revert it. linux never claimed that softirq could steal all cpu time. Are by any chance still running a HZ=100 kernel ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
