Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:23:18PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> @@ -1399,13 +1405,17 @@ static int pxad_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>> return PTR_ERR(pdev->base);
>>
>> of_id = of_match_device(pxad_dt_ids, &op->dev);
>> - if (of_id)
>> + if (of_id) {
>> of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "#dma-channels",
>> &dma_channels);
>> - else if (pdata && pdata->dma_channels)
>> + of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "#requestors",
>> + &nb_requestors);
>
> I think we should check the return value here. This might be err in case
> when we have older DT on platform, but still should work with default in
> that case
Okay, but how should the code react to the err case, more specifically to
-EINVAL or -ENODATA ? As this property is optional as per the device-tree
description, the current code leaves nb_requestors = 0, as is specified in the
description, and fits the mmp_pdma case.
What do you think should be done ? A warning message ? Something else ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
