On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:21:57PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-) > > > > > > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series. > > > > > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > > > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the > > > specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, > > > for patches 4,5,6 > > Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't > > be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go > > thru ARM tree. > > > > Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not > > provided.. > > > > So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or > > independent. I don't mind either > > In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3 > "ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree. > > Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip > devicetree additions also going into 4.6 . Sounds good, will queue them up -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
