Hi Wolfram, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wolfram Sang > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 5:03 PM > To: Sricharan > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ntelkar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx; galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] i2c: qup: Add support for v2 tags and bam dma > > > > Sricharan R (6): > > > i2c: qup: Change qup_wait_writeready function to use for all timeouts > > > i2c: qup: Add V2 tags support > > > i2c: qup: Transfer each i2c_msg in i2c_msgs without a stop bit > > > i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities > > > dts: msm8974: Add blsp2_bam dma node > > > dts: msm8974: Add dma channels for blsp2_i2c1 node > > > > > Wolfram, Does the first 4 patches looks good to be picked up ? > > Except for patch 3 (I replied seperately), the rest looks okay to me. I > wondered a little if it would make sense to make a new driver for v2 + DMA, > because the additions were quite massive. But I'll leave it up to you if there is > enough shared code between the two versions, so that a single driver will be > better. Hmm, addition of V2 reused code, more than 50% addition of new loc in this series, lot of it from DMA, but at this point it feels ok to have it in a single driver. Regards, Sricharan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
