Hi Vinod,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:53:59AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> In general Renesas hardware is not documented to the extent where the
>> relationship between IP blocks on different SoCs can be assumed although
>> they may appear to operate the same way. Furthermore the documentation
>> typically does not specify a version for individual IP blocks. For these
>> reasons a convention of using the SoC name in place of a version and
>> providing SoC-specific compat strings has been adopted.
>>
>> Although not universally liked this convention is used in the bindings for
>> most drivers for Renesas hardware. The purpose of this patch is to
>> update the Renesas R-Car DMA Controller driver to follow this convention.
>
> Applied, thanks
This patch (and this patch only) has disappeared from your next branch between
January 6 and 7, and thus wasn't included in your pull request for v4.5.
Was there a specific reason for that, or was it just an oversight?
Note that the added compatible values in in use (in arm-soc/for-next).
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
