Hi Vinod,
(CC'ing Linus as he's mentioned)
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 14:55:50 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> * Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> [2016-01-13 19:06:01 +0530]:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:17:46AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> Enable slave transfers to devices behind IPMMU:s by mapping the slave
> >> addresses using the dma-mapping API.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> >> index 7820d07..da94809 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> >> #include <linux/list.h>
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >> @@ -1101,6 +1102,24 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan,
> >> dma_addr_t buf_addr,
> >> return desc;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static dma_addr_t __rcar_dmac_dma_map(struct dma_chan *chan,
> >> phys_addr_t addr,
> >> + size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> >> +{
> >> + struct rcar_dmac_chan *rchan = to_rcar_dmac_chan(chan);
> >> + struct page *page = phys_to_page(addr);
> >> + size_t offset = addr - page_to_phys(page);
> >> + dma_addr_t map = dma_map_page(chan->device->dev, page, offset, size,
> >> + dir);
> >
> > Hmmmm, dmaengine APIs for slave cases expect that client has already
> > ammped and provided an address which the dmaengine understands. So doing
> > this in driver here does not sound good to me
>
> It was my understanding that clients do not do this mapping and in fact
> are expected not to. Is this not what Linus Walleij is trying to address
> in '[PATCH] dmaengine: use phys_addr_t for slave configuration'?
There's a problem somewhere and we need to fix it. Clients currently pass
physical addresses and the DMA engine API expects a DMA address. There's only
two ways to fix that, either modify the API to expect a phys_addr_t, or modify
the clients to provide a dma_addr_t.
The struct device used to map buffer through the DMA mapping API needs to be
the DMA engine struct device, not the client struct device. As the client is
not expected to have access to the DMA engine device I would argue that DMA
engines should perform the mapping and the API should take a phys_addr_t.
Vinod, unless you have reasons to do it otherwise, can we get your ack on this
approach and start hammering at the code ? The problem has remained known and
unfixed for too long, we need to move on.
> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> The documentation already says these are physical addresses, and
> >>> we have concluded that any translation into the DMA address space
> >>> needs to reside in the dmaengine driver, so change the type of
> >>> the passed arguments
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
