On 4 December 2015 at 10:20, Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:59:28AM +0000, G Gregory wrote: >> On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:18AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote: >> >>>> From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> >> >>>> >> >>>> Inspired by acpi platform bus type, to make driver "porting" more >> >>>> straightforward, this patch introduces ACPI support to the AMBA bus >> >>>> type. Instead of writing ACPI "glue" drivers for the exiting AMBA >> >>>> drivers. >> >>> Hmm, isn't there already similar patch series bringing AMBA ACPI >> >>> support? >> >>> >> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/30/394 >> >> Err, I see the patch for the first time... >> >> >> >> But looks like it isn't accepted till now. Will he continue to work on >> >> it? >> > >> > Sure, Graeme is working on the updated version now :) >> > >> Yes, as Hanjun said I am planning a v2. I've just been caught up in >> other business this week and probably next week. >> > > OK, thanks to clarify it. Could you please take care of AMD use case > that we need a configurable fix_rate clk, periphid, and platform data? > I will take a look at your patch in detail when I redo my series. Thanks Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
