On Monday 30 November 2015 15:45:30 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Changes since RFC v01:
>- dma_request_chan(); lost the mask parameter
>- The new API does not rely on RESOURCE_DMA, instead the dma_filter_map table
> will be used to provide the needed information to the filter function in
> legacy mode
>- Extended the example patches to convert most of daVinci to use the new API to
> request the DMA channels.
Very nice overall. Just a few minor comments.
> static struct dma_filter_map da830_edma_map[] = {
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.0", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 0)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.0", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 1)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.1", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 2)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.1", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 3)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.2", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 4)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("davinci-mcasp.2", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 5)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("spi_davinci.0", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 14)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("spi_davinci.0", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 15)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("da830-mmc.0", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 16)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("da830-mmc.0", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 17)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("spi_davinci.1", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 18)),
> DMA_FILTER_ENTRY("spi_davinci.1", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 19)),
> };
I wonder if we should mandate that the lookup table is 'const'.
We could also drop the DMA_FILTER_ENTRY() macro above, and open-code the
table like
static struct dma_filter_map da830_edma_map[] = {
{ "davinci-mcasp.0", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 0)},
{ "davinci-mcasp.0", "tx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 1)},
{ "davinci-mcasp.1", "rx", EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 2)},
...
};
which is a little more compact and more obvious, but loses the
named initializers.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
