On Thursday, November 26, 2015 06:45:17 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 18:30 +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 11/26/2015 05:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > This is an amendment to previously pushed commit 01ac170ba29a (ACPI
> > > / LPSS:
> > > allow to use specific PM domain during ->probe()). We can't assign
> > > anything to
> > > the platform device on ADD_DEVICE stage since it might be changed
> > > during
> > > unbound / bind cycle.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 9 +++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> > > index f9e0d09..e840229 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> > > @@ -705,8 +705,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct
> > > notifier_block *nb,
> > > }
> > >
> > > switch (action) {
> > > - case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
> > > + case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
> > > pdev->dev.pm_domain = &acpi_lpss_pm_domain;
> > > + break;
> > > + case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER_ERROR:
> > > + case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
> > > + pdev->dev.pm_domain = NULL;
> > > + break;
> > > + case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
> >
> > This won't fix like revert of original commit does.
Which commit exactly are you talking about, for reference?
> > Primary problem here
> > is that there is no explicit power on at all during LPSS device probe
> > because dev->pm_domain is set before probing.
>
> And we can't do this as in very original code of acpi_lpss.c since DMA
> has to be sure it's powered on while probing. We could guarantee this
> only in case when PM domain is assigned already and we do our quirk for
> it.
>
> From my point of view we have to fix hang first since it's most painful
> case for users and their experience. Though I'm open to any better
> solution if you have any in mind.
>
> >
> > driver_probe_device
> > platform_drv_prove
> > dev_pm_domain_attach
> > acpi_dev_pm_attach
> > returns instantly because of dev->pm_domain is set
This looks like a candidate for the new PM domain callbacks, ->activate and
->dismiss.
->activate() is called before the probe, so it may power up things.
->dismiss() in turn is called in the failed probe case, so it can do the
cleanup.
Have you considered using these?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
