Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:31:57AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >
> >Almost all DMA engine drivers come with some sort of selftest code
> >called from probe. I followed the same design pattern.
> 
> As others have said, it appears that's outdated.
> 
> Is there a real possibility that the hardware could fail the test
> without trashing the system?  It seems that if the DMA engine is
> faulty, it won't "politely" fail.  The whole system will crash or
> some memory will get corrupted and you won't know it.

Failing politely would be right thing to do. If DMA starts sending data to
anywhere in system memory due to bug or wrong addresses we can't do
anything to prevent that

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux