Vinod, On 11/02/2015 12:04 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this patch. >> >> For bootlog: >> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20151102/bbb-arm-omap2plus_defconfig.html >> >> 2) Please avoid merging DT/platform code in your driver tree, Vinod, >> at least without an ack from the platform maintainer. It can be a a >> huge mess if they end up causing conflicts, so we always ask to merge >> the DT changes through the platform maintainer (Tony in this case) by >> default. > > I did warn when applying that I am doing so without ACK on ARM code, noone > said a thing! > > I knew Tony was following the work by Peter so assumed he must have been okay > with it otherwise would have spoken for ~couple of weeks these were in > review > > Anyway now that we have a regression, I can revert this patch if that fixes, > please confirm, but might break edma... peter? Can you revert or drop the last two DTS patches? I think I will try a different route to get the split of the tpcc and tptc. Without the DT patches the driver will fall back to the legacy mode so things will work in a same way they did before. Or I can send a followup patch for edma.c, with that there is no need to add the HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE to hwmod and power management looks better. Basically I'm registering a 'dummy' driver for the edma3-tptc so omap hwmod code will not shut it down but we will keep the possibility to manage the power state still. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
