Re: [PATCH 3/7] dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 08/31/2015 10:08 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Hi Maxime,

On ma, 2015-08-31 at 09:49 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 07/09/2015 10:17 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
+static int __exit st_fdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	wait_for_completion(&fdev->fw_ack);
+
+	st_fdma_clk_disable(fdev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
Since this driver is built-in only this means st_fdma_remove() can
never be used, right?
It's not because a driver is built-in only that it does not need a
remove callback.
An instance can be probed/removed any time via driver's bind/unbind
SysFS entries.
Am I missing something?
(This discussion is moot because Peter already stated that a new version
will be modular.)

It follows from the __exit tag that st_fdma_remove() should never be
part of the kernel image (in this version of the patch), doesn't it?
Yes, you are right.
The remove callback is relevant, but without the __exit tag.

(I don't know what happens in this situation if an unbind sysfs entry is
used to remove a driver. I've never tried that.)


Not checked whether the function is omitted when built-in, but in any case, I thnk remove callbacks should not be tagged with __exit.

Regards,
Maxime


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux