Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] DMA: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:47:13AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 23/08/15 15:17, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:49:09PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > 
> >> @@ -1543,7 +1531,7 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >>  	int ret;
> >>  
> >>  	/* Enable clock before accessing register */
> >> -	ret = tegra_dma_runtime_resume(dev);
> >> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > 
> > why is this required ?
> 
> Because the clock could be disabled when this function is called. This
> function saves the DMA context so that if the context is lost during
> suspend, it can be restored.

Have you verified this? Coz my understanding is that when PM does suspend it
will esnure you are runtime resume if runtime suspended and then will do
suspend.
So you do not need to do above

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux