On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used >> > when MFD >> > core removes the device. >> > >> > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed >> > order. This >> > behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on order, >> > i.e. >> > consider MFD device with serial bus controller, such as SPI, and >> > DMA IP that is >> > attached to serial bus controller: before remove the DMA driver we >> > have to be >> > ensured that no DMA transfers is ongoing and the requested channel >> > are unused. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Applied, thanks. > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in (today's) > linux-next. New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2-rc1 was released (which just happened last night)? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html