Re: [PATCH 2/2] scatterlist: cleanup sg_chain() and sg_unmark_end()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> It allows getting a cleaner slate for the next merge window, which seems
> useful on it's own.  The re-addition of scatterwalk_sg_next seems next,
> but getting rid of the open-coded sg_chain is useful.

Sure I can take the crypto bits.

> Maybe you can take it through the crypto tree and also kill off the
> scatterwalk_sg_chain name as well while we're at it?

Sure I'm happy to take such a patch.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux