Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: Revert "drivers/dma: remove unused support for MEMSET operations"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:51:19PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:11:11PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 48a9db462d99494583dad829969616ac90a8df4e.
> > > 
> > > Some platforms actually need support for the memset operations. Bring it back.
> >
> > Bringing memset is fine, but i think you need to remove the
> > CONFIG_ASYNC_MEMSET parts, i dont see why we need them and not get rid of
> > async and add clean memset support.
> 
> Yeah, I removed most of it already, but that part slipped through.
> 
> There used to be a few drivers defining the memset operations. Do you
> want to restore these as well or should we expect people to
> reintroduce them later if needed?
Reintroduce afetr testing would be better..

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux