Hi Ivan,
On 04/14/2015 08:46 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi Sricharan,
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 12:39 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
From: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
QUP from version 2.1.1 onwards, supports a new format of
i2c command tags. Tag codes instructs the controller to
perform a operation like read/write. This new tagging version
supports bam dma and transfers of more than 256 bytes without 'stop'
in between. Adding the support for the same.
But the read and write messages size QUP_READ_LIMIT?
The READ_LIMIT is not true with the V2 tags. The controller can
read/write multiple of 256 bytes sub-transfers to make transactions
greater than > 256. Infact, i will have to remove the check for the
READ_LIMIT in case of V2. I will add that.
For each block a data_write/read tag and data_len tag is added to
the output fifo. For the final block of data write_stop/read_stop
tag is used.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[V3] Addressed comments from Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
to coalesce each i2c_msg in i2c_msgs as a single transfer.
Added macros to i2c_wait_ready function.
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 393 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 337 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
index 9ccf3e8..16a8f69 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
/* QUP Registers */
#define QUP_CONFIG 0x000
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
#define QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE 0x218
#define QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL 0x400
#define QUP_I2C_STATUS 0x404
+#define QUP_I2C_MASTER_GEN 0x408
/* QUP States and reset values */
#define QUP_RESET_STATE 0
@@ -69,6 +71,8 @@
#define QUP_CLOCK_AUTO_GATE BIT(13)
#define I2C_MINI_CORE (2 << 8)
#define I2C_N_VAL 15
+#define I2C_N_VAL_V2 7
+
/* Most significant word offset in FIFO port */
#define QUP_MSW_SHIFT (I2C_N_VAL + 1)
@@ -80,17 +84,30 @@
#define QUP_REPACK_EN (QUP_UNPACK_EN | QUP_PACK_EN)
+#define QUP_V2_TAGS_EN 1
+
#define QUP_OUTPUT_BLOCK_SIZE(x)(((x) >> 0) & 0x03)
#define QUP_OUTPUT_FIFO_SIZE(x) (((x) >> 2) & 0x07)
#define QUP_INPUT_BLOCK_SIZE(x) (((x) >> 5) & 0x03)
#define QUP_INPUT_FIFO_SIZE(x) (((x) >> 7) & 0x07)
-/* QUP tags */
+/* QUP V1 tags */
#define QUP_TAG_START (1 << 8)
#define QUP_TAG_DATA (2 << 8)
#define QUP_TAG_STOP (3 << 8)
#define QUP_TAG_REC (4 << 8)
+/* QUP v2 tags */
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_HS 0xff
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_START 0x81
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR 0x82
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP 0x83
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD 0x85
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP 0x87
+
+/* frequency definitions for high speed and max speed */
+#define I2C_QUP_CLK_FAST_FREQ 1000000
This is fast mode, if I am not mistaken.
ya, up to 1MHZ is fast and up to 3.4MHZ is HS.
We use this macro to check if the desired freq is in HS range.
The above comment can be changed though to make it clear.
+
/* Status, Error flags */
#define I2C_STATUS_WR_BUFFER_FULL BIT(0)
#define I2C_STATUS_BUS_ACTIVE BIT(8)
@@ -102,6 +119,15 @@
#define RESET_BIT 0x0
#define ONE_BYTE 0x1
+#define QUP_I2C_MX_CONFIG_DURING_RUN BIT(31)
Could you explain what is this for?
This is a new feature in the V2 version of the controller,
to support multiple i2c sub transfers without having
a 'stop' bit in-between. Without this the i2c controller
inserts a 'stop' on the bus when the WR/RD count registers
reaches zero and are configured for the next transfer. So setting
this bit when the controller is in 'RUN' state, avoids sending the
'stop' during RUN state.
I can add this comment in the patch.
+
+struct qup_i2c_block {
+ int blocks;
+ u8 *block_tag_len;
+ int *block_data_len;
+ int block_pos;
+};
+
struct qup_i2c_dev {
struct device*dev;
void __iomem*base;
@@ -115,9 +141,17 @@ struct qup_i2c_dev {
int in_fifo_sz;
int out_blk_sz;
int in_blk_sz;
-
+ struct qup_i2c_blockblk;
unsigned longone_byte_t;
+ int is_hs;
+ bool use_v2_tags;
+
+ int tx_tag_len;
+ int rx_tag_len;
+ u8 *tags;
+ int tags_pos;
+
struct i2c_msg*msg;
/* Current posion in user message buffer */
int pos;
@@ -263,10 +297,19 @@ static int qup_i2c_wait_ready(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int op, bool val,
}
}
Is this better tag related fields grouping?
struct qup_i2c_tag_block {
u8 tag[2];
// int tag_len; this is alway 2, or?
int data_len; // this could be zero, right?
};
There is a struct for qup_i2c_block which has tag and data len. Not sure
what change you suggest above ? Also with V2 transfers tag len need
not be 2. It can be more than that based on the data len.
-static void qup_i2c_set_write_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_set_write_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+ int run)
And 'run' stands for?
'run' just says whether the controller is in 'RUN' or 'RESET' state.
I can change it to is_run_st to make it clear.
{
- /* Number of entries to shift out, including the start */
- int total = msg->len + 1;
+ /* Total Number of entries to shift out, including the tags */
+ int total;
+
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+ total = msg->len + qup->tx_tag_len;
+ if (run)
+ total |= QUP_I2C_MX_CONFIG_DURING_RUN;
What?
This means, if the controller is in 'RUN' state, for
reconfiguring the RD/WR counts this bit has to be set to avoid
'stop' bits.
+ } else {
+ total = msg->len + 1; /* plus start tag */
+ }
if (total < qup->out_fifo_sz) {
/* FIFO mode */
@@ -280,7 +323,7 @@ static void qup_i2c_set_write_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
*msg)
}
}
-static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_issue_write_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
{
u32 addr = msg->addr << 1;
u32 qup_tag;
@@ -321,7 +364,136 @@ static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
*msg)
}
}
-static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
+ struct i2c_msg *msg, int last)
+{
+ u16 addr = (msg->addr << 1) | ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == I2C_M_RD);
+ int len = 0, prev_len = 0;
+ int blocks = 0;
+ int rem;
+ int block_len = 0;
+ int data_len;
+
+ qup->blk.block_pos = 0;
+ qup->pos = 0;
+ qup->blk.blocks = (msg->len + QUP_READ_LIMIT - 1) / QUP_READ_LIMIT;
+ rem = msg->len % QUP_READ_LIMIT;
+
+ /* 2 tag bytes for each block + 2 extra bytes for first block */
+ qup->tags = kzalloc((qup->blk.blocks * 2) + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+ qup->blk.block_tag_len = kzalloc(qup->blk.blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
+ qup->blk.block_data_len = kzalloc(sizeof(*qup->blk.block_data_len) *
+ qup->blk.blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
Whouldn't be easy to kcalloc struct qup_i2c_tag_block?
Allocations could fail and memory is leaking here.
ya correct, will change this. Freeing is done at the end of xfer
function, but will have to check for allocation failure.
+
+ while (blocks < qup->blk.blocks) {
+ /* 0 is used to specify a READ_LIMIT of 256 bytes */
+ data_len = (blocks < (qup->blk.blocks - 1)) ? 0 : rem;
+
+ /* Send START and ADDR bytes only for the first block */
+ if (!blocks) {
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
+
+ if (qup->is_hs) {
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_HS;
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
+ }
+
+ qup->tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
+ qup->tags[len++] = addr >> 8;
I have counted 5 bytes for first block?
Yes 5 bytes for TEN bit addresses or HS mode. So i will have to add
extra bytes in the above allocation. Will change that. Thanks for
pointing.
+ }
+
+ /* Send _STOP commands for the last block */
+ if ((blocks == (qup->blk.blocks - 1)) && last) {
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP;
+ else
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP;
+ } else {
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
+ else
+ qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR;
+ }
+
+ qup->tags[len++] = data_len;
+ block_len = len - prev_len;
+ prev_len = len;
+ qup->blk.block_tag_len[blocks] = block_len;
+
+ if (!data_len)
+ qup->blk.block_data_len[blocks] = QUP_READ_LIMIT;
+ else
+ qup->blk.block_data_len[blocks] = data_len;
+
+ qup->tags_pos = 0;
Every time?
ok, infact unsed. Will remove it.
+ blocks++;
Looks like 'for' cycle to me.
sorry, not getting it ?
+ }
+
+ qup->tx_tag_len = len;
+
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blk.blocks * 2);
+ else
+ qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
+}
+
+static u32 qup_i2c_send_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int tlen, u8 *tbuf,
+ int dlen, u8 *dbuf)
+{
+ u32 val = 0, idx = 0, pos = 0, i = 0, t;
+ int len = tlen + dlen;
+ u8 *buf = tbuf;
+
+ while (len > 0) {
+ if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_FULL, 0, 4)) {
+ dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo out full");
+ break;
Error not propagated?
Ok, will change this and another place to return the err no correctly.
+ }
+
+ t = (len >= 4) ? 4 : len;
+
+ while (idx < t) {
+ if (!i && (pos >= tlen)) {
+ buf = dbuf;
+ pos = 0;
+ i = 1;
+ }
+ val |= buf[pos++] << (idx++ * 8);
+ }
+
+ writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
+ idx = 0;
+ val = 0;
+ len -= 4;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+ u32 data_len = 0, tag_len;
+
+ tag_len = qup->blk.block_tag_len[qup->blk.block_pos];
+
+ if (!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD))
+ data_len = qup->blk.block_data_len[qup->blk.block_pos];
+
+ qup_i2c_send_data(qup, tag_len, qup->tags, data_len, msg->buf);
This assumes that writes are up to 256 bytes, and tags and data blocks
are completely written to FIFO buffer, right?
Yes, since we send/read data in blocks (256 bytes).
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
+ *msg)
+{
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+ qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(qup, msg);
+ else
+ qup_i2c_issue_write_v1(qup, msg);
+}
+
+static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+ int run, int last)
{
unsigned long left;
int ret;
@@ -329,13 +501,20 @@ static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
qup->msg = msg;
qup->pos = 0;
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+ qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(qup, msg, last);
+ else
+ qup->blk.blocks = 0;
+
enable_irq(qup->irq);
- qup_i2c_set_write_mode(qup, msg);
+ qup_i2c_set_write_mode(qup, msg, run);
- ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
+ if (!run) {
+ ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
To run away, or not?
Means, if the controller is not in RUN state, put it in to 'RUN'
state.
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+ }
writel(qup->clk_ctl, qup->base + QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL);
@@ -363,10 +542,13 @@ static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
ret = -EIO;
goto err;
}
- } while (qup->pos < msg->len);
+ qup->blk.block_pos++;
+ } while (qup->blk.block_pos < qup->blk.blocks);
/* Wait for the outstanding data in the fifo to drain */
- ret = qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_NOT_EMPTY, RESET_BIT, ONE_BYTE);
+ if (last)
+ ret = qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_NOT_EMPTY, RESET_BIT,
+ ONE_BYTE);
err:
disable_irq(qup->irq);
@@ -375,8 +557,17 @@ err:
return ret;
}
-static void qup_i2c_set_read_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len)
+static void qup_i2c_set_read_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len, int run)
{
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+ len += qup->rx_tag_len;
+ if (run) {
+ len |= QUP_I2C_MX_CONFIG_DURING_RUN;
Again? It looks like some kind of magic, to trick the controller
that there are more bytes to transfer, or?
This means, reconfiguring the _COUNTS when the controller is in
'RUN' state to avoid having 'stop' bit on the bus.
+ qup->tx_tag_len |= QUP_I2C_MX_CONFIG_DURING_RUN;
+ }
+ writel(qup->tx_tag_len, qup->base + QUP_MX_WRITE_CNT);
+ }
+
if (len < qup->in_fifo_sz) {
/* FIFO mode */
writel(QUP_REPACK_EN, qup->base + QUP_IO_MODE);
@@ -389,7 +580,8 @@ static void qup_i2c_set_read_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len)
}
}
-static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
+ struct i2c_msg *msg)
{
u32 addr, len, val;
@@ -402,20 +594,28 @@ static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
}
+static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
+ *msg)
+{
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+ qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(qup, msg);
+ else
+ qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(qup, msg);
+}
-static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
{
- u32 opflags;
u32 val = 0;
int idx;
+ int len = msg->len + qup->rx_tag_len;
Is this intentional?
Yes, since i changed the loop around qup_i2c_read_one to count for
blocks. Ok, as you say i can change and keep if (use->v2_tags) checks
in one place, set the variables accordingly to have better
readability.
- for (idx = 0; qup->pos < msg->len; idx++) {
+ for (idx = 0; qup->pos < len; idx++) {
if ((idx & 1) == 0) {
/* Check that FIFO have data */
- opflags = readl(qup->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
- if (!(opflags & QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY))
+ if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY, 1, 4)) {
This should be part of the first patch.
ok correct. Will move this below.
+ dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo not empty");
break;
-
+ }
/* Reading 2 words at time */
val = readl(qup->base + QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE);
@@ -426,11 +626,50 @@ static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
}
}
-static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
+ struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ int idx;
+ int pos = 0;
+ /* 2 extra bytes for read tags */
+ int total = qup->blk.block_data_len[qup->blk.block_pos] + 2;
+
+ while (pos < total) {
+ /* Check that FIFO have data */
+ if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY, 1, 4)) {
+ dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo not empty");
+ break;
Error not propagated.
ok, will change this.
+ }
+ val = readl(qup->base + QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE);
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++, val >>= 8, pos++) {
+ /* first 2 bytes are tag bytes */
+ if (pos < 2)
+ continue;
+
+ if (pos >= total)
+ return;
+
+ msg->buf[qup->pos++] = val & 0xff;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
+ struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+ qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(qup, msg);
+ else
+ qup_i2c_read_fifo_v1(qup, msg);
+}
+
+static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+ int run, int last)
{
unsigned long left;
int ret;
-
/*
* The QUP block will issue a NACK and STOP on the bus when reaching
* the end of the read, the length of the read is specified as one byte
@@ -444,28 +683,34 @@ static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
qup->msg = msg;
qup->pos = 0;
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+ qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(qup, msg, last);
+ else
+ qup->blk.blocks = 0;
enable_irq(qup->irq);
- qup_i2c_set_read_mode(qup, msg->len);
+ qup_i2c_set_read_mode(qup, msg->len, run);
- ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
+ if (!run) {
+ ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
If !run, place controller in RUN state?
Yes, correct.
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+ }
writel(qup->clk_ctl, qup->base + QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL);
- ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_PAUSE_STATE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
+ do {
+ ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_PAUSE_STATE);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
- qup_i2c_issue_read(qup, msg);
+ qup_i2c_issue_read(qup, msg);
- ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
+ ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
- do {
left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&qup->xfer, HZ);
if (!left) {
writel(1, qup->base + QUP_SW_RESET);
@@ -481,7 +726,8 @@ static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
}
qup_i2c_read_fifo(qup, msg);
- } while (qup->pos < msg->len);
+ qup->blk.block_pos++;
This should not be incremented, unless we really have read this block.
We are reading it and only then incrementing it.
+ } while (qup->blk.block_pos < qup->blk.blocks);
err:
disable_irq(qup->irq);
@@ -495,7 +741,7 @@ static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
int num)
{
struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
- int ret, idx;
+ int ret, idx, last;
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qup->dev);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -507,7 +753,12 @@ static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
goto out;
/* Configure QUP as I2C mini core */
- writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+ writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL_V2, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+ writel(QUP_V2_TAGS_EN, qup->base + QUP_I2C_MASTER_GEN);
+ } else {
+ writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+ }
for (idx = 0; idx < num; idx++) {
if (msgs[idx].len == 0) {
@@ -520,23 +771,32 @@ static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
goto out;
}
+ reinit_completion(&qup->xfer);
+
+ last = (idx == (num - 1));
+
if (msgs[idx].flags & I2C_M_RD)
- ret = qup_i2c_read_one(qup, &msgs[idx]);
+ ret = qup_i2c_read_one(qup, &msgs[idx], idx, last);
else
- ret = qup_i2c_write_one(qup, &msgs[idx]);
+ ret = qup_i2c_write_one(qup, &msgs[idx], idx, last);
if (ret)
break;
+ }
+ if (!ret)
ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RESET_STATE);
- if (ret)
- break;
- }
if (ret == 0)
ret = num;
out:
+ if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+ kfree(qup->tags);
+ kfree(qup->blk.block_tag_len);
+ kfree(qup->blk.block_data_len);
+ }
+
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(qup->dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(qup->dev);
@@ -559,6 +819,14 @@ static void qup_i2c_enable_clocks(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
clk_prepare_enable(qup->pclk);
}
+static const struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1"},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.1.1"},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1"},
Space before closing brace, please.
ok, will change.
I am starting to think that it will be more readable
if we just define qup_i2c_algo_v2 and use it, if
controller is v2 and upwards?
As i said will keep all the use_v2 tags check in one place
to have better readability.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
