* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> [150326 05:32]: > On 03/26/2015 12:56 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> + > >> +static void ti_dma_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data) > >> +{ > >> + struct ti_dma_xbar_data *xbar = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >> + struct ti_dma_xbar_map *map = route_data; > >> + > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapping XBAR%d (was routed to %d)\n", > >> + map->xbar_in, map->xbar_out); > >> + > >> + regmap_write(xbar->regmap, map->xbar_out * 2, 0); > > just out of curiosity how much do you save using regmap :) > > good point, not much I guess. I had it implemented w/o regmap as well, but > thought why not use regmap if it is available. Regmap is nice for slow devices and devices in a shared register range like the omap syscon general area. For normal use, there's quite a bit of overhead with regmap compared to just read/write :) Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html