Hi Laurent > > > Morimoto-san, do you think we need to care about out-of-tree drivers here, > > > or could we merge slave_id and real_slave_id already ? > > > > Sorry, what does your "out-of-tree" mean ? > > That's the drivers that are not part of the kernel that Arnd mentioned in this > commit message. This patches have out-of-tree code compatibility. Please check this patch with "shdma_config" > > > > drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > > > drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 12 +++---- > > > > drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c | 2 -- > > > > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h | 2 -- > > > > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_dma.c | 4 --- > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c | 2 -- > > > > drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 1 - > > > > drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c | 1 - > > > > include/linux/shdma-base.h | 1 + > > > > > > This might need to be split into different patches to avoid conflicts when > > > merging. > > > > OK, will try in v2 > > If you can get the various maintainers involved in this to agree on a single > tree through which to merge the patch there will be no need to split it, but > as 3 subsystems are involved it might be difficult to avoid merge conflicts. Thank you for your comment. I have concerned about conflict issue for LTSI backporting too. So, split into different patches is good idea :) Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
