Re: [PATCH 2/5] i2c: sh_mobile: add DMA support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:45:33AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > Quite right, this is a good question. Today we cannot distinguish between the
> > two. Should we improve the deferred probe to tell us when the init
> > is complete and all the modules have been initialized? If we ever have such
> > a mechanism to check then we know no modules are to be inserted then we can
> > fall back to PIO mode.
> 
> Well, the user can load modules from userspace. And I could imagine
> there are people wanting to defer things until they load a module
> manually. And surely there will be a case where, for some reason, the
> deferred code has to be built-in. I trust Murphy's law here...
in a dev system yes, but in a production system there wont be manual step!

-- 
~Vinod

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux