On Monday 08 December 2014 18:19:17 Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > include/linux/platform_data/ is not a correct place to keep the API > > definitions for edma, it is meant to be only for the pdata for the device. > > Clean up this by moving the API to include/linux/edma.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/common/edma.c | 3 +- > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c | 1 + > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 1 + > > drivers/dma/edma.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/edma.h | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 148 ++-------------------------- > > sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.h | 1 + > > 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 include/linux/edma.h > I was hoping that this will have delete for platform_data/edma.h, do we > still need that and why shouldn't we get rid of this I think the platform_data/edma.h file is needed for as long as we have mach-davinci systems that are not converted to boot using DT. At the current pace of development in that area, I would expect that to take a few more years at least: da850 support is slowly proceeding (since 2012), da830 should be fairly straightforward to add once da850 is done, but I haven't seen anybody start working on the dm* socs for DT. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
