On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:47:46AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:41:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at > > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that > > generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. > > > > That has been done mostly through two steps: by moving out the > > sub-commands of the device_control callback, so that the dmaengine > > core can then infer from that wether a sub-command is implemented, and > > then by moving the slave properties, such as the supported buswidth, > > to the structure dma_device itself. > > Okay managed to get this done. Apart from the two issues identified didn't > find anything so applied and pushed to a branch > "topic/slave_caps_device_control_fix" > > Today did some compile tests and found few warnings, were trivial but I > am worried about the testing of this code. Has anyone tested this, if so > which platforms are covered Since I pushed base branch last night, Feng's > bot covered it and all was OK. Looks like Feng's bot doesn't have wide > coverage of arm platforms, wasn't there one run by arm guys which tries to > test and boot, if so can we get this tested there please. Tested with your branch on sama5d3 and sama5d4 so at_hdmac and at xdmac. I have also sent some patches based on Maxime's series for at_xdmac. Ludovic > > So bit sceptical for merging now. I will send the patches which I have > applied on top of this > > Thanks > -- > ~Vinod > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
