On 11/27/2014 11:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 27 November 2014 20:46:12 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> >> I see. With this series I did not planed to fix all edma related issues, just >> as a start clean up the related header files. I would rather not add fixes to >> mmc, spi, etc drivers since while you have valid point it is not in the scope >> of this series. >> Can we do the changes you are suggesting in an incremental manner? > > Sure, but I'd leave the existing filter function declaration alone then > and not move it, since we wouldn't want to keep it in the long run. but if you want to reference the filter function (which is in drivers/dma/edma.c) in arch/arm/mach-davinci/ directory, we will need it. Don't we? If I leave the header as it is, then how would we clean up the edma headers? I would not put the API definitions for the arch code into the same file as we have the filter definition. > > Arnd > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
