On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 02:51PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > The specification requires xlnx,data-width, but example and driver use > xlnx,datawidth. Change the specification to match the implementation. Isn't this the wrong way around? The bindings are considered API, so shouldn't the driver be fixed to match the spec? Are there already dts files out there using either of these options? Soren -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
