Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that > generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. > > That has been done mostly through two steps: by moving out the > sub-commands of the device_control callback, so that the dmaengine > core can then infer from that wether a sub-command is implemented, and > then by moving the slave properties, such as the supported buswidth, > to the structure dma_device itself. > > Comments are as usual appreciated! How can we move forward on this? I didn't have any comments on this version, and gathered quite a lot of Acked-by already. Do you want me to rebase on top of your current next branch and send you a pull request? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
