Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> If dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() or dmaengine_submit() fail, we may leak
>> unused DMA descriptors.
>
> This doesn't apply, I guess it may depend on some of your other DMA
> related patches but it's not immediately obvious and it's not been sent
> as part of a series. Can you please check and/or clarify?
Indeed, this (and the rspi one) depended on the two "Handle
dmaengine_prep_slave_single() failures gracefully" patches.
Unless you recover them from e.g. patchwork, I'll resend them with my
next batch.
Sorry for the fuzz.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
