On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:48:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> This patch adds a driver for NBPF DMAC IP cores from Renesas, designed for
> the AMBA AXI bus.
>
> +struct nbpf_desc {
> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor async_tx;
> + bool user_wait;
sounds odd?
> +static int nbpf_chan_probe(struct nbpf_device *nbpf, int n)
> +{
> + struct dma_device *dma_dev = &nbpf->dma_dev;
> + struct nbpf_channel *chan = nbpf->chan + n;
> + int ret;
> +
> + chan->nbpf = nbpf;
> + chan->base = nbpf->base + NBPF_REG_CHAN_OFFSET + NBPF_REG_CHAN_SIZE * n;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chan->desc_page);
> + spin_lock_init(&chan->lock);
> + chan->dma_chan.device = dma_dev;
> + dma_cookie_init(&chan->dma_chan);
> + nbpf_chan_prepare_default(chan);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dma_dev->dev, "%s(): channel %d: -> %p\n", __func__, n, chan->base);
> +
> + snprintf(chan->name, sizeof(chan->name), "nbpf %d", n);
> +
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dma_dev->dev, chan->irq,
> + nbpf_chan_irq, nbpf_chan_irqt, IRQF_SHARED,
> + chan->name, chan);
devm_request_irq and friends arent apt here. You are in .remove and get an
irq, what prevents that race? You need to run free_irq and synchronize_irq()
to ensure everything is proper before freeing up.
Also why threaded_irq when dmaengine API mandates you to use tasklet? The
callback is supposed to be invoked from a tasklet.
Thanks
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
