On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:41:34PM +0530, Srikanth Thokala wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:33:42PM +0530, Srikanth Thokala wrote:
>> >> This is the driver for the AXI Video Direct Memory Access (AXI
>> >> VDMA) core, which is a soft Xilinx IP core that provides high-
>> >> bandwidth direct memory access between memory and AXI4-Stream
>> >> type video target peripherals. The core provides efficient two
>> >> dimensional DMA operations with independent asynchronous read
>> >> and write channel operation.
>> >>
>> >> This module works on Zynq (ARM Based SoC) and Microblaze platforms.
>> >
>> > Okay the series is fine and was going to apply it BUT
>> > 1) need ack on DT patch..
>> > 2) issues below on managing the descriptor and resetting the cookie :(
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * xilinx_vdma_tx_descriptor - Allocate transaction descriptor
>> >> + * @chan: Driver specific VDMA channel
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Return: The allocated descriptor on success and NULL on failure.
>> >> + */
>> >> +static struct xilinx_vdma_tx_descriptor *
>> >> +xilinx_vdma_alloc_tx_descriptor(struct xilinx_vdma_chan *chan)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct xilinx_vdma_tx_descriptor *desc;
>> >> + unsigned long flags;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (chan->allocated_desc)
>> >> + return chan->allocated_desc;
>> > ??
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> + desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> + if (!desc)
>> >> + return NULL;
>> >> +
>> >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
>> >> + chan->allocated_desc = desc;
>> > ah why do you need this?
>> >
>> > So this essentailly prevents you from preparing two trasactions at same time as
>> > you would overwrite??
>>
>> This will allow to queue up multiple segments on to a single
>> transaction descriptor.
>> User will submit this single desc and in the issue_pending() we decode multiple
>> segments and submit to SG HW engine. We free up the allocated_desc when it is
>> submitted to the HW. This is added after my discussion with Jaswinder, to best
>> utilize HW SG engine.
>
> I think best utilization of HW SG engine would happen if we collate the pending
> list when you start dma....
Is that ok if I revisit this code as an enhancement at a later time?
Srikanth
>
> --
> ~Vinod
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
