Re: [PATCH 6/7] DMA: Freescale: use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock_irqsave

[Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
> > required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
> > instead. Interrupts will be turned off and context will be saved, it is
> > unnecessary to use irqsave.
> >
> > This patch changes all instances of spin_lock_irqsave() to spin_lock_bh(). All
> > manipulation of protected fields is done using tasklet context or weaker, which
> > makes spin_lock_bh() the correct choice.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <qiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/dma/fsldma.c |   25 ++++++++++---------------
> >   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> > index bbace54..437794e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> > @@ -396,10 +396,9 @@ static dma_cookie_t fsl_dma_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> >   	struct fsldma_chan *chan = to_fsl_chan(tx->chan);
> >   	struct fsl_desc_sw *desc = tx_to_fsl_desc(tx);
> >   	struct fsl_desc_sw *child;
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> >   	dma_cookie_t cookie = -EINVAL;
> >   
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   
> >   	/*
> >   	 * assign cookies to all of the software descriptors
> > @@ -412,7 +411,7 @@ static dma_cookie_t fsl_dma_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> >   	/* put this transaction onto the tail of the pending queue */
> >   	append_ld_queue(chan, desc);
> >   
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   
> >   	return cookie;
> >   }
> > @@ -731,15 +730,14 @@ static void fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(struct fsldma_chan *chan,
> >   static void fsl_dma_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan)
> >   {
> >   	struct fsldma_chan *chan = to_fsl_chan(dchan);
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> >   
> >   	chan_dbg(chan, "free all channel resources\n");
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   	fsldma_cleanup_descriptors(chan);
> >   	fsldma_free_desc_list(chan, &chan->ld_pending);
> >   	fsldma_free_desc_list(chan, &chan->ld_running);
> >   	fsldma_free_desc_list(chan, &chan->ld_completed);
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   
> >   	dma_pool_destroy(chan->desc_pool);
> >   	chan->desc_pool = NULL;
> > @@ -958,7 +956,6 @@ static int fsl_dma_device_control(struct dma_chan *dchan,
> >   {
> >   	struct dma_slave_config *config;
> >   	struct fsldma_chan *chan;
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> >   	int size;
> >   
> >   	if (!dchan)
> > @@ -968,7 +965,7 @@ static int fsl_dma_device_control(struct dma_chan *dchan,
> >   
> >   	switch (cmd) {
> >   	case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
> > -		spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +		spin_lock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   
> >   		/* Halt the DMA engine */
> >   		dma_halt(chan);
> > @@ -979,7 +976,7 @@ static int fsl_dma_device_control(struct dma_chan *dchan,
> >   		fsldma_free_desc_list(chan, &chan->ld_completed);
> >   		chan->idle = true;
> >   
> > -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +		spin_unlock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   		return 0;
> >   
> >   	case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> > @@ -1021,11 +1018,10 @@ static int fsl_dma_device_control(struct dma_chan *dchan,
> >   static void fsl_dma_memcpy_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *dchan)
> >   {
> >   	struct fsldma_chan *chan = to_fsl_chan(dchan);
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> >   
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   	fsl_chan_xfer_ld_queue(chan);
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   }
> >   
> >   /**
> > @@ -1124,11 +1120,10 @@ static irqreturn_t fsldma_chan_irq(int irq, void *data)
> >   static void dma_do_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> >   {
> >   	struct fsldma_chan *chan = (struct fsldma_chan *)data;
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> >   
> >   	chan_dbg(chan, "tasklet entry\n");
> >   
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> okay here is the problem :(
>
> You moved to _bh variant. So if you grab the lock in rest of the code
> and irq gets triggered then here we will be spinning to grab the lock.
> So effectively you made right locking solution into deadlock situation!

If the rest code grabs lock by spin_lock_bh(), and if irq raised, the 
tasklet could not be executed because it has been disabled by the _bh 
variant function.
Right?

> >   
> >   	/* the hardware is now idle and ready for more */
> >   	chan->idle = true;
> > @@ -1136,7 +1131,7 @@ static void dma_do_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> >   	/* Run all cleanup for descriptors which have been completed */
> >   	fsldma_cleanup_descriptors(chan);
> >   
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->desc_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_bh(&chan->desc_lock);
> >   
> >   	chan_dbg(chan, "tasklet exit\n");
> >   }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html