On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:39:32PM +0100, Christian Engelmayer wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:02:00 +0530, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Christian Engelmayer wrote: > > > Fix a memory leak in the edma_prep_dma_cyclic() error handling path. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@xxxxxx> > > > > Both are already fixed upstream and availble in -next, which tree was this > > generated against? > > The patch was originally generated against mainline and verified against > linux-next as well as > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/dmaengine.git > git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git > > I can see those 2 issues fixed in function edma_prep_slave_sg() about a week > before the introduction of edma_prep_dma_cyclic() that this patch aims at > and that seems to incorporate the same error pattern. > > I currently still see the defect in function edma_prep_dma_cyclic() in -next. > Am I really looking at the wrong tree? My bad, I mistook it for similar fixes done in prep_sg. I have applied this now Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
