Re: [PATCH] dma: Remove comment about embedding dma_slave_config into custom structs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 14:21 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:

[]

> + * If not: if it is fixed so that it be sent in static from the platform
> + * data, then prefer to do that.

This configuration is per channel, correct?

Then it sounds wrong to pass this via platform data, especially in case
when, for example, channels are equal and user doesn't care which
channel they would like to use.


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki 
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 
Domiciled in Helsinki 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux