On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 19:10 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > The preferred term is "on" instead of "yes". > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> > --- > multipath/multipath.conf.5.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in > b/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in > index 0c1eff40..bdb6b605 100644 > --- a/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in > +++ b/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in > @@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ Both multipathd and multipath treat every non- > blacklisted device as multipath > device path. > .TP > .I smart > -This differs from \fIfind_multipaths yes\fR only in > +This differs from \fIfind_multipaths on\fR only in > the way it treats new devices for which only one path has been > detected yet. When such a device is first encountered in udev rules, > it is > treated as a multipath device. multipathd waits whether additional > paths with
