On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:19:30PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 10:50:08AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > So, this code clearly isn't getting tested - at all. Besides this bug, > > the parsing for the "corrupt" modes is also broken. > > > > Guys, don't push broken crap, and figure out how to write some tests. > > Thank you sir, may we have another? > > Like you never introduced a bug in your life? > > Not going to tolerate your entitled primadonna attitude here. You are > capable of being better, you've chosen not to be on this issue (twice) Talking about basic engineering standards is in no way "being a prima donna". Testing your changes is as basic as it gets, and this code wasn't tested _at all_.
